Stipend for Advocates

State Of Andhra Pradesh vs R Punnayya 1971

  1. The Court opined that there is no dispute regarding the death of the
    accused and there being a direct connection administered by the
    accused 1 and accused 2 to the deceased and his death.
  2. Both the accused confined by beating to the legs and arms of the
    deceased and therefore they had no intention of causing the death of
    the deceased within the section 299(a) or section 300 of Indian Penal
    Code, 1860.
  3. High Court reached to the conclusion by stating some reasons. That
    there was no premeditation attack, and it was an impulsive act. That
    all the 21 injuries were on arms and legs and not on any vital parts of
    the body. That no compound fracture was there as to hemorrhage but
    some bleeding which stopped after some time. That the death had
    been occurred after 21 hours later which could have been by duly
    shock and due to hemorrhage. That the accused 1 and 2 used sticks to
    attack with heavy sticks which doesn’t result in any fracture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Receive the latest contents

Subscribe to us.

Get notified about new articles