Introduction: What is “Free Consent”?
For any agreement to be a valid contract, the consent of the parties must be genuine and free. The law says that two or more people “consent” (Section 13) when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense. This is the principle of consensus ad idem (meeting of the minds).
But just giving consent isn’t enough. That consent must also be free.
Under Section 14 of the Act, consent is considered “free” when it is NOT caused by any of the following five elements:
- Coercion (Section 15)
- Undue Influence (Section 16)
- Fraud (Section 17)
- Misrepresentation (Section 18)
- Mistake (Sections 20, 21, 22)
If your “yes” to a contract is obtained using any of these methods, the contract may not be valid. Let’s break each one down.
The Five Vitiating Factors (What Spoils Consent)
A. Coercion (Section 15)
- What it is: This is essentially forcing someone into a contract using physical pressure or threats.
- The Legal Bit: Coercion involves:
- Committing (or threatening to commit) any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
- Unlawfully detaining (or threatening to detain) any property.
- Simple Example: ‘A’ threatens to burn down ‘B’s factory if ‘B’ doesn’t sell his car to ‘A’ for a low price. ‘B’s consent is obtained by coercion.
- Effect of Coercion (Section 19): The contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was coerced. This means ‘B’ can choose to either go through with the contract or cancel it.
B. Undue Influence (Section 16)
- What it is: This is mental, moral, or emotional pressure, not physical. It happens when one party is in a dominant position and uses that position to get an unfair advantage.
- The Legal Bit: This often occurs in relationships where there is trust, such as:
- Doctor and patient
- Lawyer and client
- Parent and child
- Spiritual guru and devotee
- Simple Example: A doctor (‘A’) convinces his elderly, dependent patient (‘B’) to sell him his house for a fraction of its market value. This is undue influence.
- Effect of Undue Influence (Section 19A): The contract is voidable at the option of the party whose will was dominated.
C. Fraud (Section 17)
- What it is: Plain and simple, this is intentional deception. It’s when one party lies or hides a fact on purpose to trick the other party into the contract.
- The Legal Bit: Fraud includes:
- Making a statement you know is false.
- Actively concealing a fact you know about (e.g., painting over a huge crack in a wall).
- Making a promise with no intention of performing it.
- Any other act fitted to deceive.
- Simple Example: ‘A’ sells a horse to ‘B’, claiming it is “perfectly sound.” ‘A’ knows the horse is lame but hides it. This is fraud.
- Effect of Fraud (Section 19): The contract is voidable. The tricked party can also claim damages.
D. Misrepresentation (Section 18)
- What it is: This is also a false statement, but it’s innocent. The person making the statement genuinely believes it to be true, even though it’s not. There is no intention to deceive.
- The Legal Bit: It’s an “innocent misstatement.”
- Simple Example: ‘A’ tells ‘B’ that his factory produces 500 units a day. ‘A’ honestly believes this based on old reports. In reality, it only produces 300. ‘A’ has made a misrepresentation.
- Effect of Misrepresentation (Section 19): The contract is voidable. The other party can cancel it, but (unlike fraud) generally cannot sue for damages.
E. Mistake (Sections 20, 21, 22)
- What it is: This is where one or both parties are under a misunderstanding about a key fact of the contract.
- The Legal Bit: This is the most different factor.
- Bilateral Mistake (Section 20): If both parties are mistaken about an essential fact (like the subject matter), the agreement is VOID from the very beginning.
- Unilateral Mistake (Section 22): If only one party is mistaken, the contract is generally still valid.
- Mistake of Law (Section 21): Ignorance of the law is no excuse. The contract is valid.
- Simple Example (Bilateral): ‘A’ agrees to sell his car to ‘B’. Unknown to both of them, the car was destroyed in a fire the night before. Since both parties are mistaken about the existence of the car (an essential fact), the contract is void.
Summary: Voidable vs. Void
| Factor | Section | Intent to Deceive? | Effect on Contract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coercion | 15 | Not relevant (uses force) | Voidable |
| Undue Influence | 16 | Not relevant (uses influence) | Voidable |
| Fraud | 17 | Yes (Intentional lie) | Voidable |
| Misrepresentation | 18 | No (Innocent mistake) | Voidable |
| Mistake (Bilateral) | 20 | Not relevant (mutual error) | VOID |
- Voidable: The contract is valid until the injured party chooses to cancel it.
- Void: The contract is invalid from the start. It never legally existed.
Conclusion
Free consent is the foundation of a valid contract. Without a true “meeting of the minds,” the law protects the innocent party by giving them a way out. Always remember: a contract signed under threat, deception, or a fundamental error isn’t a contract at all—it’s a liability.
- Dying declaration
- Bihar APO Exam Date 2026: Prelims Scheduled for July 15 – Check Official Notification
- UP APO Exam Date 2026 Announced: Check UPPSC Official Calendar & Schedule
- Indian Army JAG 124 Notification 2026: Vacancies, Eligibility, and Apply Online
- Official IBPS 2026-27 Calendar Out: Check SO Law & RRB Scale II Dates
